NYJetsChat: Gabriel on Kizer - NYJetsChat

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Gabriel on Kizer

#1 User is offline   hmhertz 

  • Old Goat
  • Group: Site Donor
  • Posts: 80,493
  • Joined: 26-April 04

Posted 12 February 2017 - 12:30 AM

http://chicago.cbslo...-deshone-kizer/
Ferrid, the big hose knows

#2 User is offline   dcat 

  • Dumb & Dumber
  • Group: Site Donor
  • Posts: 7,833
  • Joined: 27-December 04

Posted 12 February 2017 - 09:09 AM

View Posthmhertz, on 12 February 2017 - 12:30 AM, said:



best review of Kizer Ive read. But don't the 2016 excuses sound similar to those offered by Hackeberg proponents? i.e. 2015: solid, veteran OL, but 2016 inexperienced/rookie OL. 2015: experienced WR group but 2016, inexperienced freshmen WRs.

Sounds a hell of a lot like Hackenberg excuses.
Fold for Darnold.

#3 User is offline   hmhertz 

  • Old Goat
  • Group: Site Donor
  • Posts: 80,493
  • Joined: 26-April 04

Posted 12 February 2017 - 12:29 PM

View Postdcat, on 12 February 2017 - 09:09 AM, said:

best review of Kizer Ive read. But don't the 2016 excuses sound similar to those offered by Hackeberg proponents? i.e. 2015: solid, veteran OL, but 2016 inexperienced/rookie OL. 2015: experienced WR group but 2016, inexperienced freshmen WRs.

Sounds a hell of a lot like Hackenberg excuses.

Hackenkrap had good receivers and a great RB in his sucky last year, all the parts of this years explosive
State were on the team with him. PS offensive line has been bad for two years
Ferrid, the big hose knows

#4 User is offline   bajakian 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Site Donor
  • Posts: 4,174
  • Joined: 01-April 05

Posted 14 February 2017 - 07:16 AM

View Posthmhertz, on 12 February 2017 - 12:29 PM, said:

Hackenkrap had good receivers and a great RB in his sucky last year, all the parts of this years explosive
State were on the team with him. PS offensive line has been bad for two years


So Henry would you be happy if he was drafted by the Jets in round 1? Do you agree with Gabriels assessment that he is the best prospect in this draft? Or should we take a Left tackle and suck for Sam??

#5 User is offline   hmhertz 

  • Old Goat
  • Group: Site Donor
  • Posts: 80,493
  • Joined: 26-April 04

Posted 14 February 2017 - 08:45 AM

View Postbajakian, on 14 February 2017 - 07:16 AM, said:

So Henry would you be happy if he was drafted by the Jets in round 1? Do you agree with Gabriels assessment that he is the best prospect in this draft? Or should we take a Left tackle and suck for Sam??



I like Watson & Dubinsky, not hot on the Kaiser.
The biggest mistakes in recent drafts is taking a LT high.
This year's tackle class is shit. I think Shell might have a shot at LT
Ferrid, the big hose knows

#6 User is offline   John Tobin 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Site Donor
  • Posts: 27,749
  • Joined: 28-February 04

Posted 14 February 2017 - 09:11 PM

View Postbajakian, on 14 February 2017 - 07:16 AM, said:

So Henry would you be happy if he was drafted by the Jets in round 1? Do you agree with Gabriels assessment that he is the best prospect in this draft? Or should we take a Left tackle and suck for Sam??


I'll say this for the 4th time. I'm an ND fan. Kizer couldn't even beat out Malik Zaire.
Who?
Exactly.
He couldn't beat him out clean.
Is he bad?
No, he's okay.
Tends to sail the ball too often.
Can run.
Does NOT project to a franchise QB.
I don't even feel confident projecting him as a starter.
I don't dislike him; I'm just not impressed.

Blow off the year and get the USC kid. Then, we're in business.
They go by points

#7 User is offline   dcat 

  • Dumb & Dumber
  • Group: Site Donor
  • Posts: 7,833
  • Joined: 27-December 04

Posted 15 February 2017 - 10:00 AM

View Postbajakian, on 14 February 2017 - 07:16 AM, said:

So Henry would you be happy if he was drafted by the Jets in round 1? Do you agree with Gabriels assessment that he is the best prospect in this draft? Or should we take a Left tackle and suck for Sam??



There are absolutely no LT's worth taking at #6. None. It's even worse than last year, where some OT starved teams reached horribly in round 1 for prospects that were mid to late round 2 material or even later. (i.e. NY Giants and the God-awful Flowers pick that was a full round or more too early.)
Fold for Darnold.

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users